Scholarly open access journals, Peer-reviewed, and Refereed Journals, Impact factor 8.14 (Calculate by google scholar and Semantic Scholar | AI-Powered Research Tool) , Multidisciplinary, Monthly, Indexing in all major database & Metadata, Citation Generator, Digital Object Identifier(DOI)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License
Published Paper Details
Paper Title:
A CRITICAL STUDY ON CLINICAL TRIALS UNDER THE NEW DRUGS AND CLINICAL TRIALS RULES, 2019 AND DATA EXCLUSIVITY UNDER TRIPS AGREEMENT: COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF THE US, EU, AND INDIA
Authors Name:
Kavya. S
, MB Swathi , Ra. Hinia Mirzha , Sandhiya Shree. U
Clinical trials constitute an indispensable component of pharmaceutical innovation, ensuring the safety, efficacy, and quality of medicinal products before they are introduced into the market. In India, the enactment of the New Drugs and Clinical Trials Rules, 2019 (NDCTR, 2019) marked a significant shift in the regulation of clinical research by introducing stricter ethical safeguards, streamlined approval procedures, compensation mechanisms, and enhanced responsibilities for sponsors and ethics committees. Simultaneously, the increasing importance of intellectual property protection under the Agreement on Trade-Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights (TRIPS Agreement), particularly Article 39.3 concerning protection of undisclosed pharmaceutical test data, has intensified the debate surrounding data exclusivity and access to medicines.
The present dissertation critically analyses the legal and ethical framework governing clinical trials under the NDCTR, 2019 and examines the concept of data exclusivity under the TRIPS Agreement through a comparative analysis of the United States, the European Union, and India. The study explores the conflict between pharmaceutical innovation and public health interests, particularly in relation to the availability of affordable generic medicines. The research evaluates whether India’s present legal framework sufficiently balances obligations under international intellectual property law with constitutional commitments towards public health and access to healthcare.
The dissertation further analyses landmark judicial decisions such as Novartis AG v. Union of India, which shaped India’s approach towards pharmaceutical monopolies and public health safeguards. The study concludes that India has adopted a comparatively balanced regulatory approach by strengthening clinical trial governance while refraining from introducing TRIPS-plus data exclusivity obligations that may adversely affect access to medicines.
Keywords:
Clinical Trials, NDCTR 2019, Data Exclusivity, TRIPS Agreement, Article 39.3, Pharmaceutical Regulation, Public Health, Generic Medicines, Intellectual Property Rights, CDSCO, FDA, EMA, Access to Medicines, Pharmaceutical Test Data
Cite Article:
"A CRITICAL STUDY ON CLINICAL TRIALS UNDER THE NEW DRUGS AND CLINICAL TRIALS RULES, 2019 AND DATA EXCLUSIVITY UNDER TRIPS AGREEMENT: COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF THE US, EU, AND INDIA", International Journal for Research Trends and Innovation (www.ijrti.org), ISSN:2456-3315, Vol.11, Issue 5, page no.b622-b637, May-2026, Available :http://www.ijrti.org/papers/IJRTI2605171.pdf
Downloads:
00055
ISSN:
2456-3315 | IMPACT FACTOR: 8.14 Calculated By Google Scholar| ESTD YEAR: 2016
An International Scholarly Open Access Journal, Peer-Reviewed, Refereed Journal Impact Factor 8.14 Calculate by Google Scholar and Semantic Scholar | AI-Powered Research Tool, Multidisciplinary, Monthly, Multilanguage Journal Indexing in All Major Database & Metadata, Citation Generator