IJRTI
International Journal for Research Trends and Innovation
International Peer Reviewed & Refereed Journals, Open Access Journal
ISSN Approved Journal No: 2456-3315 | Impact factor: 8.14 | ESTD Year: 2016
Scholarly open access journals, Peer-reviewed, and Refereed Journals, Impact factor 8.14 (Calculate by google scholar and Semantic Scholar | AI-Powered Research Tool) , Multidisciplinary, Monthly, Indexing in all major database & Metadata, Citation Generator, Digital Object Identifier(DOI)

Call For Paper

For Authors

Forms / Download

Published Issue Details

Editorial Board

Other IMP Links

Facts & Figure

Impact Factor : 8.14

Issue per Year : 12

Volume Published : 10

Issue Published : 115

Article Submitted : 19447

Article Published : 8041

Total Authors : 21252

Total Reviewer : 769

Total Countries : 144

Indexing Partner

Licence

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License
Published Paper Details
Paper Title: HoneyPot Cyber Security
Authors Name: Soham Bhikaji Bandkar
Download E-Certificate: Download
Author Reg. ID:
IJRTI_201831
Published Paper Id: IJRTI2503232
Published In: Volume 10 Issue 3, March-2025
DOI:
Abstract: HONEYPOT Soham Bhikaji Bandkar Cybersecurity Researcher / Student Guru Nanak Khalsa College Mumbai Abstract : A honeypot is a deception tool, designed to entice an attacker to compromise the electronic information systems of an organization. If deployed correctly, a honeypot can serve as an early-warning and an advanced security surveillance tool. It can be used to minimize the risks of attacks on IT systems and networks. Honeypots can also be used to analyze the ways attackers try to compromise an information system and to provide valuable insights into potential system loopholes. This research investigated the effectiveness of the existing methodologies that used honeynet to detect and prevent attacks. The study used centralized system management technologies called Puppet and Virtual Machines to implement automated honeypot solutions. A centralized logging system was used to collect information about the source IP address, country, and timestamp of attackers. The unique contributions of this thesis include: The research results show how open source technologies are used to dynamically add or modify hacking incidences in high-interaction honeynet system; the thesis outlines strategies for making honeypots more attractive for hackers to spend more time to provide hacking evidence. Introduction: Honeypots are an innovative cybersecurity mechanism designed to detect, deflect, and analyze unauthorized access attempts on information systems. By creating a controlled environment that simulates a legitimate target, honeypots lure cyber attackers away from actual systems, allowing security professionals to monitor and study their behavior in real-time. This approach not only helps in understanding the tactics, techniques, and procedures (TTPs) employed by attackers but also aids in enhancing overall security measures. A honeypot can be configured to resemble various digital assets, including servers, applications, or entire networks. It is intentionally designed to appear vulnerable and enticing to attackers, thus encouraging them to engage with the system. When attackers interact with a honeypot, they reveal their methods and intentions, providing invaluable insights for cybersecurity analysts. This data can then be used to strengthen defenses against future attacks. Honeypots can be categorized into two main types: low-interaction and high-interaction. Low-interaction honeypots simulate specific services with limited engagement, making them easier to deploy and manage. In contrast, high-interaction honeypots provide a more realistic environment that allows attackers to interact extensively with the system, yielding richer data but requiring more resources and management. The strategic deployment of honeypots can significantly enhance an organization’s security posture by serving as an early warning system for potential threats. By analyzing the traffic directed toward honeypots, organizations can identify attack patterns and emerging threats, thereby adapting their security protocols accordingly. However, deploying honeypots also presents challenges, such as legal implications regarding data collection and the risk of attackers exploiting these decoys for further attacks. Related work: How do honeypots work? In many ways, a honeypot looks exactly like a genuine computer system. It has the applications and data that cyber criminals use to identify an ideal target. A honeypot can, for instance, pretend to be a system that contains sensitive consumer data, such as credit card or personal identification information. The system can be populated with decoy data that may draw in an attacker looking to steal and use or sell it. As the attacker breaks into the honeypot, the IT team can observe how the attacker proceeds, taking note of the various techniques they deploy and how the system’s defenses hold up or fail. This can then be used to strengthen the overall defenses used to protect the network. Honeypots use security vulnerabilities to lure in attackers. They may have ports that are vulnerable to a port scan, which is a technique for figuring out which ports are open on a network. A port left open may entice an attacker, allowing the security team to observe how they approach their attack. Honeypotting is different from other types of security measures in that it is not designed to directly prevent attacks. The purpose of a honeypot is to refine an organization’s intrusion detection system (IDS) and threat response so it is in a better position to manage and prevent attacks. There are two primary kinds of honeypots: production and research. Production honeypots focus on the identification of compromises in your internal network, as well as fooling the malicious actor. Production honeypots are positioned alongside your genuine production servers and run the same kinds of services.Research honeypots, on the other hand, collect information regarding attacks, focusing not just on how threats act within your internal environment but how they operate in the wider world. Gathering information about threats in this way can help administrators design stronger defense systems and figure out which patches they need to prioritize. They can then ensure that sensitive systems have up-to-date security measures to defend against the attacks that fell for the honeypot’s lures. Honeypots in Network Security The deployment of honeypots presents several challenges that must be addressed to maximize their effectiveness in network security. One significant challenge is ensuring compliance with legal frameworks governing data collection and privacy. In many jurisdictions, especially under regulations like the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR), collecting data from attackers can raise substantial legal concerns. Honeypot operators must navigate these complexities while ensuring that they do not infringe on individual privacy rights. The rapid evolution of cyber threats necessitates innovative approaches to network security. Honeypots have gained prominence as effective tools for detecting and analyzing malicious activities within networks. A honeypot is a decoy system that mimics legitimate services to lure attackers, allowing security professionals to observe their tactics without compromising actual resources. The introduction outlines the historical context of honeypots, detailing their classification into low-interaction and high-interaction types. Low-interaction honeypots simulate specific services with limited engagement, while highinteraction honeypots provide a more realistic environment by allowing attackers to interact with genuine operating systems. This paper emphasizes the significance of understanding attacker behavior through honeypots, which can lead to improved defensive strategies. Furthermore, it discusses the integration of honeypots into broader security frameworks, highlighting their role in enhancing overall network resilience. Graphical Visual in Honeypot Attack Data Analysis Honeypots are decoy systems designed to attract cyber attackers by simulating vulnerable services, allowing security professionals to observe and analyze malicious activities in a controlled envi ronment. As cyber threats evolve, the need for effective analysis of attack data captured by honeypots becomes increasingly critical. Visualization plays a pivotal role in this analysis, enabling security analysts to detect patterns, trends, and anomalies within complex datasets. However, many practitioners lack adequate training in visualization principles, which can result in ineffective interpretation of data. This paper delves into the current state of graphical visual methods used in honeypot attack data analysis. By employing the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) methodology, the study reviews existing literature on visualization practices within the context of honeypots. It categorizes commonly used graphical methods and assesses their effectiveness in conveying critical insights about cyber threats. The introduction sets the stage for understanding how improved visualization techniques can enhance threat detection and response capabilities. The graphical visual methods utilized in honeypot attack data analysis. We will identify common visualization practices, evaluate their effectiveness in revealing attack patterns, and highlight areas where current methodologies fall short. Additionally, we will propose recommendations for adopting more advanced visualization techniques that can improve the interpretability of honeypot data. Honeypot on Azure Services Honeypots within Microsoft Azure services as a proactive approach to network threat management. Honeypots are decoy systems designed to attract attackers, allowing organizations to monitor and analyze malicious activities without risking actual resources. The architecture of honeypots, their effectiveness in capturing attack vectors, and the specific challenges associated with their deployment in cloud environments. Furthermore, it highlights the legal and ethical considerations of using honeypots while ensuring compliance with data protection regulations. The findings aim to establish a framework for effectively utilizing honeypots in Azure services to enhance organizational security. Organizations relying on cloud services like Microsoft Azure. As businesses increasingly adopt cloud-based solutions, they become attractive targets for cybercriminals seeking to exploit vulnerabilities. Honeypots have emerged as a valuable tool for network threat management, providing a mechanism to detect, analyze, and respond to malicious activities. Issues of Privacy: The privacy issues associated with honeypots and honeynets, particularly focusing on the legal frameworks governing data collection and processing. It discusses how IP addresses are classified as personal data under EU law, which complicates the legal landscape for honeypot operators. The analysis highlights the importance of understanding what data can be legally collected, the conditions for data retention, and the implications of monitoring user interactions. While honeypots contribute to a greater understanding of cyber threats, they also pose risks related to privacy violations that must be carefully managed. This paper aims to provide a comprehensive overview of these issues, offering insights into best practices for deploying honeypots while ensuring compliance with privacy regulations. The legal framework surrounding data protection, particularly in the EU, imposes strict regulations on how personal data can be collected and processed. One major challenge is ensuring compliance with legal frameworks governing data protection, particularly in jurisdictions like the EU where regulations are stringent. Honeypots often collect various types of data, including IP addresses and communication content, which can be classified as personal data under laws such as the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR). This classification necessitates careful consideration regarding consent and purpose limitation for data processing. Benefits of using honeypot: 1. Threat Intelligence Honeypots provide real-time and accurate information about emerging threats and attack methods. By capturing data on how attackers interact with the honeypot, organizations can gain insights into the tactics, techniques, and procedures employed by cybercriminals. This intelligence is critical for refining existing security measures and developing new strategies to counteract evolving threats. 2. Early Detection of Attacks Honeypots act as an early warning system for potential attacks. By attracting attackers, they can identify malicious activities before they reach critical systems. This proactive approach allows security teams to respond quickly and effectively to threats, minimizing potential damage . 3. Understanding Attacker Behavior Studying interactions with honeypots enables security professionals to analyze attacker behavior, tools, and motivations. This understanding can inform defensive strategies and help organizations anticipate future attacks 4. Diversion from Real Assets Honeypots serve to divert attackers' attention away from valuable assets. By engaging with a decoy system, attackers waste time and resources, giving defenders more opportunities to respond effectively to real threats . 5. Low False Positive Rates Unlike traditional intrusion detection systems (IDS), which can generate numerous false alerts, honeypots have low false positive rates. This characteristic allows organizations to focus their resources on genuine threats, improving overall efficiency in threat management . 6. Forensics and Attribution Honeypots play a crucial role in cyber forensics by capturing detailed logs of an attacker's actions. This information can aid in attributing attacks to specific individuals or groups based on their behavior patterns, which is essential for legal and investigative purposes . 7. Training and Awareness Honeypots can serve as effective training tools for cybersecurity professionals. They provide a controlled environment where security teams can observe various types of cyberattacks without the risk of compromising actual systems . This hands-on experience enhances their incident response skills. 8. Internal Threat Detection While most organizations focus on external threats, honeypots can also help detect internal threats. By monitoring interactions within the network, they can reveal malicious activities conducted by insiders or compromised accounts. 9. Research Opportunities Honeypots facilitate research into new attack vectors and techniques used by cybercriminals. By analyzing data collected from honeypot interactions, security experts can identify trends and develop countermeasures accordingly Conclusion: In conclusion, honeypots are a powerful addition to any cybersecurity strategy. They not only enhance threat detection and response capabilities but also provide valuable insights into attacker behavior and emerging threats. By implementing honeypots effectively, organizations can significantly improve their overall security posture while gaining a deeper understanding of the cyber threat landscape References: 1. “Honeypot in network security” (January 2011) https://www.researchgate.net/publication/220846415_Honeypot_in_network_se curity_A_survey 2. “Systematic Review of Graphical Visual Methods in Honeypot Attack Data Analysis” https://www.scirp.org/journal/paperinformation?paperid=119344 3. “Honeypot on Azure Services” (Ocotober 2023) https://www.researchgate.net/publication/374915220_Establishing_Cloud_Security_by_Setting_up_Honeypot_on_Azure_Services 4. “Honeypots and honeynets: issues of privacy” https://jis-eurasipjournals.springeropen.com/articles/10.1186/s13635-017-0057-4 5. “New framework for adaptive and agile honeypots” https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.4218/etrij.2019-0155 6. Analysis and implementation of honeypot framework for enchancing network security https://www.researchgate.net/publication/372990071_Analysis_and_Implementation_of_Honeypot_Framework_for_Enhancing_Network_Security
Keywords:
Cite Article: "HoneyPot Cyber Security ", International Journal of Science & Engineering Development Research (www.ijrti.org), ISSN:2455-2631, Vol.10, Issue 3, page no.c212-c217, March-2025, Available :http://www.ijrti.org/papers/IJRTI2503232.pdf
Downloads: 000401
ISSN: 2456-3315 | IMPACT FACTOR: 8.14 Calculated By Google Scholar| ESTD YEAR: 2016
An International Scholarly Open Access Journal, Peer-Reviewed, Refereed Journal Impact Factor 8.14 Calculate by Google Scholar and Semantic Scholar | AI-Powered Research Tool, Multidisciplinary, Monthly, Multilanguage Journal Indexing in All Major Database & Metadata, Citation Generator
Publication Details: Published Paper ID: IJRTI2503232
Registration ID:201831
Published In: Volume 10 Issue 3, March-2025
DOI (Digital Object Identifier):
Page No: c212-c217
Country: MUMBAI, MAHARASHTRA, India
Research Area: Information Technology 
Publisher : IJ Publication
Published Paper URL : https://www.ijrti.org/viewpaperforall?paper=IJRTI2503232
Published Paper PDF: https://www.ijrti.org/papers/IJRTI2503232
Share Article:

Click Here to Download This Article

Article Preview
Click Here to Download This Article

Major Indexing from www.ijrti.org
Google Scholar ResearcherID Thomson Reuters Mendeley : reference manager Academia.edu
arXiv.org : cornell university library Research Gate CiteSeerX DOAJ : Directory of Open Access Journals
DRJI Index Copernicus International Scribd DocStoc

ISSN Details

ISSN: 2456-3315
Impact Factor: 8.14 and ISSN APPROVED, Journal Starting Year (ESTD) : 2016

DOI (A digital object identifier)


Providing A digital object identifier by DOI.ONE
How to Get DOI?

Conference

Open Access License Policy

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License

Creative Commons License This material is Open Knowledge This material is Open Data This material is Open Content

Important Details

Join RMS/Earn 300

IJRTI

WhatsApp
Click Here

Indexing Partner