 |
International Journal for Research Trends and Innovation
International Peer Reviewed & Refereed Journals, Open Access Journal
ISSN Approved Journal No: 2456-3315 | Impact factor: 8.14 | ESTD Year: 2016
Scholarly open access journals, Peer-reviewed, and Refereed Journals, Impact factor 8.14 (Calculate by google scholar and Semantic Scholar | AI-Powered Research Tool) , Multidisciplinary, Monthly, Indexing in all major database & Metadata, Citation Generator, Digital Object Identifier(DOI)
|
Issue: July 2026
Volume 11 | Issue 7
Review Result and Publication of Paper within : 2-3 days
Click Here For more DetailsFor Authors
Forms / Download
Published Issue Details
Editorial Board
Other IMP Links
Facts & Figure
Impact Factor : 8.14
Issue per Year : 12
Volume Published : 11
Issue Published : 122
Article Submitted : 25323
Article Published : 9497
Total Authors : 25208
Total Reviewer : 873
Total Countries : 172
Indexing Partner
Licence
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License
|
Published Paper Details
|
|
| Paper Title: | Nursing Students' Perceptions of Teaching Method Effectiveness: A Cross-Sectional Descriptive Study |
| Authors Name: | Dr. Sangeetha Fredy , Mrs. LIJO S George , Mrs. Rasiya Razak J , Mrs. Resmi. S. R |
| Download E-Certificate: | Download |
| Author Reg. ID: |
IJRTI_213857
|
| Published Paper Id: | IJRTI2607021 |
| Published In: | Volume 11 Issue 7, July-2026 |
| DOI: | |
| Abstract: | ABSTRACT Background: Nursing education requires diverse pedagogical approaches to prepare students for complex clinical environments. Understanding student perceptions of various teaching methods is essential for curriculum development and instructional improvement. Objective: To assess nursing students' perceptions of the effectiveness of lecture methods, demonstrations, simulation-based learning, problem-based learning (PBL), clinical teaching, and e-learning/blended learning. Methods: A cross-sectional descriptive study was conducted among 80 nursing students using a structured questionnaire with a 5-point Likert scale. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics. Results: The findings revealed that Demonstration and Return Demonstration had the highest perceived effectiveness score (Mean = 3.94 ± 0.56), followed by Problem-Based Learning (Mean = 3.90 ± 0.52) and Clinical Teaching (Mean = 3.89 ± 0.60). In contrast, the Lecture Method recorded the lowest mean score (Mean = 3.78 ± 0.51). Despite these variations, all teaching methods were rated favorably by the students, with mean scores approaching 4 on a 5-point Likert scale, indicating an overall positive perception of their effectiveness. Conclusion: The findings of the study revealed that nursing students had a generally positive perception of the effectiveness of all six teaching methods. Among these, Demonstration and Return Demonstration obtained the highest perception score, while the Lecture Method received the lowest score. Although variations in mean perception scores were observed, the Friedman test indicated that these differences were not statistically significant (χ² = 9.34, df = 5, p = 0.096). This suggests that students considered all six teaching methods to be comparably effective in supporting their learning. Therefore, the findings support the use of a blended approach that integrates multiple teaching methods to enhance the overall learning experience of nursing students. |
| Keywords: | Keywords: Nursing education, teaching methods, simulation, problem-based learning, clinical teaching, student satisfaction |
| Cite Article: | "Nursing Students' Perceptions of Teaching Method Effectiveness: A Cross-Sectional Descriptive Study", International Journal for Research Trends and Innovation (www.ijrti.org), ISSN:2456-3315, Vol.11, Issue 7, page no.a194-a201, July-2026, Available :http://www.ijrti.org/papers/IJRTI2607021.pdf |
| Downloads: | 00064 |
| ISSN: |
2456-3315 | IMPACT FACTOR: 8.14 Calculated By Google Scholar| ESTD YEAR: 2016 An International Scholarly Open Access Journal, Peer-Reviewed, Refereed Journal Impact Factor 8.14 Calculate by Google Scholar and Semantic Scholar | AI-Powered Research Tool, Multidisciplinary, Monthly, Multilanguage Journal Indexing in All Major Database & Metadata, Citation Generator |
| Publication Details: |
Published Paper ID: IJRTI2607021
Registration ID:213857
Published In: Volume 11 Issue 7, July-2026
DOI (Digital Object Identifier):
Page No: a194-a201 Country: Thiruvananthapuram, Kerala, India Research Area: Health Science Publisher : IJ Publication Published Paper URL : https://www.ijrti.org/viewpaperforall?paper=IJRTI2607021 Published Paper PDF: https://www.ijrti.org/papers/IJRTI2607021 |
| Share Article: | |
|
Click Here to Download This Article |
|
| Article Preview | |
|
|
|
Major Indexing from www.ijrti.org
| Google Scholar | ResearcherID Thomson Reuters | Mendeley : reference manager | Academia.edu |
| arXiv.org : cornell university library | Research Gate | CiteSeerX | DOAJ : Directory of Open Access Journals |
| DRJI | Index Copernicus International | Scribd | DocStoc |
ISSN Details
 |
 |
|
ISSN: 2456-3315
Impact Factor: 8.14 and ISSN APPROVED,
Journal Starting Year (ESTD) : 2016
DOI (A digital object identifier)
| Providing A digital object identifier by DOI.ONE How to Get DOI? |
Conference
Open Access License Policy
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License
Important Details
Join RMS/Earn 300
WhatsApp
Click Here
Click Here
Indexing Partner |
|||
| Copyright © 2026 - All Rights Reserved - IJRTI | |||